News, Reviews and Your Views

clapbord.gif (13708 bytes)

      Movies of Oz

Movie Information for Australian's

moviesofoz.cjb.net......moviesofoz.cjb.net......moviesofoz.cjb.net.......moviesofoz.cjb.net
 

Home

Release Dates

Add a Quote

Movie Index

About                     

australia1.gif (1141 bytes)

Out this Week

Box Office

New on Video

Video Top Ten

usa1.gif (3084 bytes)

Out this Week

Box Office

New on Video

Video Top Ten


All Content*
© 2000

Movies of Oz

*except movie posters


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zemeckis, say Hanks to Tom ****

One of the true tests of an actor's greatness is whether or not they have the ability to take what is essentially a mediocre script and turn the finished film into something much better than the script should allow it to become.  Tom Hanks has already established himself as one the greatest actors of all-time and his performance alone is enough to save Cast Away from becoming totally lost at sea.

Let's get something straight right from the beginning, Cast Away, as a whole, is a little bit disappointing.  The story seems undeveloped and, despite the efforts of Hanks, it does suffer from a series of slow spots during its 143 minute running time.  Occasionally it rises to exceptional heights but it then descends back down into what sails very close to being mediocrity. In fact, only Hanks stops this film from becoming a massive disappointment.

The film is at its best after Hanks' character, Federal Express employee Chuck Noland, is washed onto the shore of a deserted island after the Federal Express plane crashes.  For the next hour almost nothing is said as Noland goes about coming to terms with the situation in which he finds himself in. 

Except for the occasional word from Hanks, all we hear during this period is the lapping of the waves onto the beach and this highlights the visual beauty of the island while at the same time heightening Noland's struggle against loneliness.  We don't see any inkling of the inevitable rescue mission that would have definitely taken place, instead the time is devoted entirely to the struggle of Noland on the island.  This approach works spectacularly well.

Hanks is captivating during this period of the film; he doesn't say much, but he doesn't have to as it is quite evident what is going through his mind merely by watching him go about trying to survive.  Some may say that too much time was devoted to the period when Noland is on the island, but this is the essence of the film and cutting it short would have been doing the film a great injustice.    It is by far the most enjoyable part of the film.

It is only when Noland gets off the island that the film begins to lose some of its impact.  The ending seems rushed and although the film does come to a satisfactory conclusion, so much more could have been explained about the the impact that Noland's experiences had on his girlfriend Kelly (Helen Hunt).   This would have meant extending the film's running time to close to three hours so I guess the filmmakers can be excused for not wanting to do this.  Still, it may just have helped Cast Away become a much more rewarding experience.

Hanks will probably pick up another Best Actor Oscar for his performance and he certainly deserves it, particularly if you think about what the film would have been like without him.   Cast Away could have been an exceptional two-hour movie or an exceptional three-hour movie but what it ends up becoming is a two-and-a-half-hour film that may leave you feeling a little disappointed.

- Adam Matthews