|
In 1996, Pulitzer prize-winning reporter Gary Webb wrote about a Black drug dealer
being supplied cocaine from a trafficker that used the drug money to support the Nicaraguan Contras. Outraged Californians
called for an investigation of the CIA. In 1998, the CIA's internal investigation revealed that the CIA had a secret agreement
with the Dept. of Justice. In that secret agreement, the CIA would NOT report ALL known drug activities to the law enforcement
branches of the Dept. of Justice. This internal investigation, along with a congressional investigation, concluded that the
CIA committed no wrongdoing. Lawyers disagreed. California was the first to sue the CIA.
Then comes Anita Belle...
...Who filed lawsuits in Florida, North Carolina, New York, Louisiana, Michigan,
Washington DC, and Maryland.
Not only did Belle file cases in several states, which the CIA didn't like. She
asked for the cases to be put together (consolidated) in one case, which was named the Nicaraguan Contras' Narcotics Trafficking
Litigation, MDL #1331, in federal court in Gainesville, Florida.
Her cases also differ from the California case because:
1. She claims drugs hurt Blacks the most often but allows others, regardless of race, who have been by drugs to join the
lawsuit.
2. She claims were DELIBERATELY targeted against Blacks.
3. She claims civil rights were violated.
4.
She claims federal tort claims, (this allows people to be awarded money from suing the government).
5. She claims the
government took part in a conspiracy.
6. She claims that deliberately placing drugs in Black neighborhoods is a form of
genocide, a crime that can go before the United Nations' International Court of Justice.
7. She adds Ronald Reagan, George
H.W. Bush, and Oliver North as defendants.
Her cases were dismissed even though:
A. She applied for default judgment before the government moved to dismiss.
B. She moved for sanctions because of the many acts of sabotage.
The federal judge, Maurice M. Paul, ignored Belle's motions and moved in favor of the federal defendants. She wondered
why the judge was biased against her. In Belle & Belle v. FBI et al, the case referenced in 'The Judges'
Secrets: Part 1', she sued Judge Paul for being a mason and part of the masons' racketeering that has infiltrated the federal
government. She never got a chance to depose Judge Paul to find out if he was a mason because another judge, who was
a mason, intervened.
|
|
For details about the sabotage against Belle and her family, read pages 6-26 in http://aebelle.tripod.com/humanrightsdefender1.pdf. These details include 7 rigged car accidents, at least one burglary, at least one racist epithet, lost court orders,
lost court motions, computer tampering, intimidated witnesses, disbarment by kangaroo courts, etc.
|
